Practice question set with answers. Use deep links to save questions.
5009 questions loaded. Showing page 20 of 63 for fast crawlable revision and deep linking.
1521. A railway store-keeper is dismissed after a departmental inquiry for pilfering railway property. The RPF later prosecutes him under Section 3 of the RP(UP) Act for the same pilferage. Relying on Maqbool Hussain v. State of Bombay (1953), what is the position under Article 20(2)?
- A. Prosecution is barred because the employee has already been punished once
- B. Prosecution is permitted only with the sanction of the General Manager
- C. Prosecution is barred only if the dismissal was upheld in appeal
- D. Prosecution is permitted because departmental proceedings are not a 'prosecution and punishment' before a court or judicial tribunal
Answer: Prosecution is permitted because departmental proceedings are not a 'prosecution and punishment' before a court or judicial tribunal
Explanation: Article 20(2) bars a second prosecution AND punishment for the same offence. Maqbool Hussain held that proceedings before a non-judicial authority (there, customs confiscation) are not prosecution before a court or judicial tribunal; likewise a departmental dismissal does not bar a criminal trial under Section 3.
1522. Which of the following is NOT a feature of the Section 8 inquiry under the RP(UP) Act?
- A. The inquiring officer himself convicts and sentences the accused
- B. The officer may summon witnesses under Section 9
- C. The officer may grant bail or forward the accused in custody
- D. The inquiry is deemed a judicial proceeding
Answer: The inquiring officer himself convicts and sentences the accused
Explanation: The inquiry is investigative and preparatory; only a Magistrate can convict and sentence.
1523. Which feature of Section 5 of the RP(UP) Act directly affects the manner in which an ordinary police station may proceed on information of such an offence?
- A. The offence is triable by Sessions only
- B. The offence is non-bailable
- C. The offence is compoundable
- D. The offence is non-cognizable, so the police cannot investigate or arrest without the Magistrate's order
Answer: The offence is non-cognizable, so the police cannot investigate or arrest without the Magistrate's order
Explanation: Non-cognizability limits ordinary police: they record the information in the general diary and refer the informant to the Magistrate under BNSS s.174.
1524. The Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act was enacted to cover a perceived gap in the ordinary law, namely that:
- A. Railway property was exempt from the penal law
- B. Railways lacked any police
- C. Proving theft of railway property by direct evidence was difficult, so possession itself was made punishable
- D. Courts had no jurisdiction over railway property
Answer: Proving theft of railway property by direct evidence was difficult, so possession itself was made punishable
Explanation: The Act targets possession because the actual thief is rarely caught, so receivers and holders of railway property are brought to account.
1525. Is a first-time offender convicted under Section 3 of the RP(UP) Act automatically entitled to be released on probation instead of serving the one-year minimum?
- A. No; the statute itself fixes the minimum unless special and adequate reasons are recorded, and release is a judicial discretion
- B. Yes, if the railway administration agrees
- C. Yes, if he is below 60
- D. Yes, always
Answer: No; the statute itself fixes the minimum unless special and adequate reasons are recorded, and release is a judicial discretion
Explanation: No offender has an automatic right to probation; the court must assess the offence and the offender and must record reasons when departing from a statutory minimum.
1526. A person is convicted under Section 3 and sentenced to the statutory minimum. Under BNSS Section 25 (old CrPC s.31), if he is also convicted at the same trial of another offence, the sentences:
- A. Run consecutively unless the court directs that they run concurrently
- B. Are merged automatically
- C. Always run concurrently
- D. Run concurrently only if both are under special laws
Answer: Run consecutively unless the court directs that they run concurrently
Explanation: BNSS s.25(1) says that sentences run consecutively unless the court directs concurrent running.
1527. A conviction under Section 3 of the RP(UP) Act is challenged because the Magistrate failed to record special reasons while awarding only six months for a first offence. The correct view is that the sentence is:
- A. Void only if the accused appeals
- B. Valid, because six months equals the minimum
- C. Valid, because Magistrates have unlimited discretion
- D. Illegal as below the statutory minimum and liable to be set aside or enhanced, since special and adequate reasons are mandatory
Answer: Illegal as below the statutory minimum and liable to be set aside or enhanced, since special and adequate reasons are mandatory
Explanation: The s.3 minimum is one year for a first offence unless special and adequate reasons are recorded in the judgment.
1528. Which statement about Section 11 of the RP(UP) Act is correct?
- A. It imports the Code of Criminal Procedure (now BNSS) for searches and arrests made under the Act, so BNSS safeguards apply
- B. It applies only to arrests, not searches
- C. It excludes all safeguards of the BNSS
- D. It makes searches subject only to railway rules
Answer: It imports the Code of Criminal Procedure (now BNSS) for searches and arrests made under the Act, so BNSS safeguards apply
Explanation: Section 11 states that searches and arrests under the Act shall be carried out in accordance with the Code of Criminal Procedure, now read as the BNSS.
1529. Under BNSS Section 106(1), a police officer may seize property which is:
- A. Only property claimed by the complainant
- B. Only property worth above one lakh rupees
- C. Only property found on railway land
- D. Alleged or suspected to have been stolen, or found under circumstances creating suspicion of the commission of an offence
Answer: Alleged or suspected to have been stolen, or found under circumstances creating suspicion of the commission of an offence
Explanation: BNSS s.106 (old CrPC s.102) is the general seizure power for suspect property, and its report-to-Magistrate duty applies in RP(UP) Act searches by virtue of s.11.
1530. Which BNSS provision, newly introduced, allows a court to attach and forfeit the 'proceeds of crime' on the application of a police officer with the approval of the Superintendent of Police?
- A. Section 185
- B. Section 94
- C. Section 351
- D. Section 107
Answer: Section 107
Explanation: BNSS s.107 provides for attachment, forfeiture or restoration of property that is the proceeds of crime, a useful tool in large-scale rail-property theft rackets.
1531. Under BNS Section 62, a person who attempts to commit an offence punishable with imprisonment and does an act towards it, but fails, is punishable with:
- A. Not more than one month
- B. The full punishment of the offence
- C. Up to one-half of the longest term provided for the offence, or fine, or both
- D. No punishment
Answer: Up to one-half of the longest term provided for the offence, or fine, or both
Explanation: BNS s.62 (old IPC s.511) caps the attempt punishment at half of the longest term of the substantive offence where no specific provision for attempt exists.
1532. Under BNS Section 3(5), when a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all, each person is:
- A. Liable only if armed
- B. Liable only for the part he physically did
- C. Not liable if he left the spot
- D. Liable for that act in the same manner as if it were done by him alone
Answer: Liable for that act in the same manner as if it were done by him alone
Explanation: BNS s.3(5) (old IPC s.34) is a rule of joint liability, not a substantive offence; useful against gangs stripping rail tracks.
1533. Under BNS Section 61(1), a criminal conspiracy exists when two or more persons agree to do, or cause to be done:
- A. Only a cognizable offence
- B. An illegal act, or a legal act by illegal means
- C. Only an offence against the State
- D. Only an offence punishable with death
Answer: An illegal act, or a legal act by illegal means
Explanation: BNS s.61(1) (old IPC s.120A) defines criminal conspiracy as an agreement to do an illegal act or a legal act by illegal means.
1534. If the act abetted (for example the theft of rail fittings) is committed in consequence of the abetment, BNS Section 49 punishes the abettor:
- A. With a fixed one-month sentence
- B. Only if he was physically present
- C. Only with a fine
- D. With the punishment provided for the offence abetted, where no express provision exists
Answer: With the punishment provided for the offence abetted, where no express provision exists
Explanation: BNS s.49 (old IPC s.109) punishes the abettor with the same punishment as the principal offence when no express provision exists for the abetment.
1535. A railway store clerk tells thieves the timing of an inspection so that they can remove brake blocks safely. Under BNS Section 45, the clerk is an abettor by:
- A. Conspiracy alone
- B. Intentionally aiding the commission of the act
- C. Instigating alone
- D. Omission with no intention
Answer: Intentionally aiding the commission of the act
Explanation: BNS s.45 recognises three modes of abetment: instigation, engaging in a conspiracy, and intentionally aiding by act or illegal omission.
1536. Section 5 of the PDPP Act, 1984 restricts bail for an accused of damaging public property by requiring that:
- A. No bail is ever allowed
- B. The accused deposit the value in court
- C. The Railway Board consent in writing
- D. The Public Prosecutor be given an opportunity to oppose and the court be satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing the accused is not guilty
Answer: The Public Prosecutor be given an opportunity to oppose and the court be satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing the accused is not guilty
Explanation: PDPP s.5 mirrors special-statute twin conditions: the Public Prosecutor must be heard and the court must record satisfaction regarding the accused's probable non-guilt.
1537. A mob sets fire to a stationary railway coach. Under Section 3(2) of the PDPP Act, 1984, the punishment is imprisonment of:
- A. Life imprisonment only
- B. Not less than one year which may extend to ten years, and fine
- C. Up to six months
- D. Up to three years only
Answer: Not less than one year which may extend to ten years, and fine
Explanation: Mischief by fire or explosive substance against public property attracts a minimum of one year and a maximum of ten years with fine under s.3(2).
1538. Under Section 3(1) of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, mischief causing damage to public property is punishable with:
- A. Fine only
- B. Death
- C. Imprisonment up to six months only
- D. Imprisonment up to five years and fine
Answer: Imprisonment up to five years and fine
Explanation: PDPP s.3(1): imprisonment up to five years and fine; s.3(2) raises it to one to ten years where fire or explosive substances are used.
1539. Under the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, 'public property' expressly includes:
- A. Only government office buildings
- B. Only land owned by the Centre
- C. Any means of public transport and any building, installation or property used in connection with it
- D. Only monuments declared by ASI
Answer: Any means of public transport and any building, installation or property used in connection with it
Explanation: Section 2(b) of the PDPP Act covers means of public transport, which includes railway rolling stock and installations.
1540. The sanction requirement of BNSS Section 218 is attracted only when the alleged offence was committed by a public servant:
- A. Only during night duty
- B. While acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty
- C. Only inside a railway premises
- D. At any time, even in private life
Answer: While acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty
Explanation: The test is a reasonable connection between the act and official duty; acts wholly outside duty, such as a private crime, do not need sanction.
1541. An RPF Sub-Inspector is prosecuted for allegedly using excessive force while arresting a suspect under Section 6 in the course of official duty. Under BNSS Section 218 (old CrPC s.197), a court can take cognizance only with the previous sanction of:
- A. The District Magistrate
- B. The Railway Board Chairman only
- C. The State Governor
- D. The Central Government, as he is employed in connection with the affairs of the Union
Answer: The Central Government, as he is employed in connection with the affairs of the Union
Explanation: BNSS s.218 requires sanction of the appropriate Government for prosecuting a public servant for acts done in the discharge of official duty; for Union employees this is the Central Government.
1542. Because Section 3 of the RP(UP) Act provides imprisonment up to five years, the offence under BNSS classification is a:
- A. Summary-trial case only
- B. Sessions-triable case
- C. Summons-case
- D. Warrant-case (punishable with imprisonment exceeding two years)
Answer: Warrant-case (punishable with imprisonment exceeding two years)
Explanation: BNSS defines a warrant-case as one relating to an offence punishable with death, life imprisonment or imprisonment exceeding two years; s.3 qualifies.
1543. The Section 8(2) proviso (a) of the RP(UP) Act, which forwards an accused to the Magistrate when evidence is sufficient, corresponds to which BNSS provision?
- A. Section 337
- B. Section 190 (old CrPC s.170) – cases to be sent to the Magistrate when evidence is sufficient
- C. Section 47
- D. Section 94
Answer: Section 190 (old CrPC s.170) – cases to be sent to the Magistrate when evidence is sufficient
Explanation: BNSS s.190 (CrPC s.170) directs forwarding the accused in custody, or taking security for appearance, to the Magistrate empowered to take cognizance.
1544. The proviso to Section 8(2) of the RP(UP) Act, which allows release on bond when evidence is insufficient, finds a parallel in which BNSS provision on police investigation?
- A. Section 482
- B. Section 359
- C. Section 189 (old CrPC s.169) – release of accused when evidence is deficient
- D. Section 351
Answer: Section 189 (old CrPC s.169) – release of accused when evidence is deficient
Explanation: BNSS s.189 requires the officer in charge to release the accused on a bond, with or without sureties, if there is deficiency of evidence or reasonable grounds of suspicion.
1545. The marginal note to Section 6 of the RP(UP) Act describes the power it confers as:
- A. Power to forfeit property
- B. Power to summon witnesses
- C. Power to search without warrant
- D. Power to arrest without warrant
Answer: Power to arrest without warrant
Explanation: Section 6 carries the heading 'Power to arrest without warrant'; search powers come under s.10 and summons under s.9.
1546. A railway gangman sells 10 kg of lawfully issued but surplus rail clips to a scrap dealer without permission. The dealer, who has no idea of the source, is charged under Section 3. His best defence is to prove:
- A. That the clips were unused
- B. That he acquired the property lawfully, e.g. in good faith for value through an ordinary market transaction, with proof of the dealing
- C. That the quantity was small
- D. That the gangman was senior
Answer: That he acquired the property lawfully, e.g. in good faith for value through an ordinary market transaction, with proof of the dealing
Explanation: The s.3 burden is to prove that the property came into the accused's possession lawfully; proof of a genuine, documented acquisition for value is the usual route, though courts weigh whether a reasonable dealer would have suspected it.
1547. Under the RP(UP) Act framework, the officer who investigates and the court that tries are distinct. Which constitutional principle does this separation primarily serve?
- A. Federalism under Article 1
- B. Freedom of trade under Article 19(1)(g)
- C. Equality of opportunity under Article 16
- D. Fair trial under Article 21 through an independent judicial determination of guilt
Answer: Fair trial under Article 21 through an independent judicial determination of guilt
Explanation: Guilt is decided by an independent Magistrate, not the investigating RPF officer, which preserves fair trial under Article 21.
1548. A taxi driver unknowingly carries a passenger's bag containing stolen railway equipment. For a Section 3 conviction against the driver, the key obstacle is:
- A. Taxis are exempt from the Act
- B. Absence of knowledge, so he lacks conscious possession of the property
- C. The Act applies only to railway land
- D. The bag is not luggage
Answer: Absence of knowledge, so he lacks conscious possession of the property
Explanation: A custodian without knowledge of the contents is not in conscious possession; the prosecution must show awareness or reasonable circumstances implying it.
1549. Which of the following is an essential distinction between 'possession' and mere 'physical presence at the place of recovery' for a Section 3 charge?
- A. Possession requires knowledge and control over the property; mere presence is not enough
- B. There is no legal difference
- C. Presence for more than one hour is possession
- D. Presence of two or more persons is possession
Answer: Possession requires knowledge and control over the property; mere presence is not enough
Explanation: Conscious possession requires awareness of the thing and the power to control it; bystanders at a recovery site are not thereby in possession.
1550. An accused argues that since property recovered was marked 'N.E.Rly' it must be railway property. The prosecution must still, for Section 3, show that:
- A. The accused is a railway employee
- B. The accused earlier confessed before a Magistrate
- C. The property is railway property as defined in Section 2 and was reasonably suspected to be stolen or unlawfully obtained
- D. The property exceeds a prescribed value
Answer: The property is railway property as defined in Section 2 and was reasonably suspected to be stolen or unlawfully obtained
Explanation: A marking is evidence of identity, but the prosecution must establish that the item falls within s.2's definition and that the s.3 conditions (possession and reasonable suspicion) are met.
1551. Arrange the correct chronological order in an RP(UP) Act case: (1) forwarding to the nearest RPF post (2) arrest without warrant (3) inquiry by the officer (4) forwarding to the Magistrate or release on bond.
- A. 2, 1, 3, 4
- B. 3, 2, 1, 4
- C. 1, 2, 3, 4
- D. 2, 3, 1, 4
Answer: 2, 1, 3, 4
Explanation: Arrest (s.6) is followed by forwarding without delay (s.7), then inquiry (s.8), and finally disposal under proviso to s.8(2).
1552. Match: (1) Section 3, (2) Section 4, (3) Section 5, (4) Section 7 with (a) non-cognizable offences, (b) forwarding of arrested person, (c) penalty for possession, (d) owner or occupier connivance.
- A. 1-b, 2-a, 3-d, 4-c
- B. 1-c, 2-d, 3-a, 4-b
- C. 1-d, 2-c, 3-b, 4-a
- D. 1-a, 2-b, 3-c, 4-d
Answer: 1-c, 2-d, 3-a, 4-b
Explanation: Section 3 penalises possession, s.4 owner/occupier connivance, s.5 declares offences non-cognizable, and s.7 deals with disposal (forwarding) of arrested persons.
1553. Match the RP(UP) Act sections: (1) Section 6, (2) Section 9, (3) Section 12, (4) Section 13 with (a) forfeiture by court, (b) duty of village officers, (c) arrest without warrant, (d) summoning power.
- A. 1-d, 2-c, 3-a, 4-b
- B. 1-c, 2-d, 3-b, 4-a
- C. 1-a, 2-b, 3-c, 4-d
- D. 1-b, 2-a, 3-d, 4-c
Answer: 1-c, 2-d, 3-b, 4-a
Explanation: Section 6 = arrest without warrant, s.9 = power to summon, s.12 = officers bound to assist, s.13 = forfeiture by the court.
1554. A person is arrested at 6 PM on a Friday in a small town for suspected possession of railway cable. The nearest Magistrate is 40 km away; courts are closed on the weekend. Within what time must he be produced before a Magistrate?
- A. Within 7 days
- B. Within 72 hours as the courts are closed
- C. Within 24 hours of arrest excluding journey time; the duty magistrate, even at his residence, must be approached
- D. On the next working Monday
Answer: Within 24 hours of arrest excluding journey time; the duty magistrate, even at his residence, must be approached
Explanation: The 24-hour constitutional limit under Article 22(2) has no exception for holidays; production before a duty Magistrate is the established practice.
1555. Plea bargaining under the BNSS is available only for offences punishable with imprisonment not exceeding:
- A. Ten years
- B. Three years
- C. Seven years
- D. Five years
Answer: Seven years
Explanation: Plea bargaining (BNSS Chapter XXIII, old CrPC Ch. XXIA) is for offences with punishment up to seven years, excluding socio-economic offences and offences against women or children under fourteen; the application must be made within 30 days of framing of charge.
1556. Can the railway administration compound an offence under Section 3 of the RP(UP) Act after the accused repays the value of the property?
- A. Yes, if the accused is a first offender
- B. No; the Act contains no compounding provision and the offence is not listed among compoundable offences under BNSS Section 359
- C. Yes, by the Station Master's written consent
- D. Yes, by the Divisional Railway Manager alone
Answer: No; the Act contains no compounding provision and the offence is not listed among compoundable offences under BNSS Section 359
Explanation: Only offences listed in BNSS s.359 (old CrPC s.320) can be compounded; repayment may be a mitigating factor at sentencing but does not extinguish the offence.
1557. A Judicial Magistrate of the First Class trying a Section 3 RP(UP) Act case finds the accused deserves four years' imprisonment. What must he do, given his three-year sentencing limit?
- A. Forward the accused to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, who may impose the higher sentence
- B. Acquit the accused
- C. Impose four years himself
- D. Order a retrial before the same Magistrate
Answer: Forward the accused to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, who may impose the higher sentence
Explanation: The procedure for a Magistrate who cannot pass a sufficiently severe sentence (old CrPC s.325) is to submit the proceedings and forward the accused to the CJM.
1558. Under the BNSS, the maximum imprisonment a Judicial Magistrate of the First Class can impose is:
- A. Five years
- B. Three years
- C. Seven years
- D. One year
Answer: Three years
Explanation: BNSS s.23 (old CrPC s.29): a JMFC may pass imprisonment up to three years and fine up to Rs 50,000; a CJM/CMM may pass up to seven years.
1559. Which of the following details is essential in a seizure memo prepared during a Section 10 search of a godown?
- A. Only the name of the railway zone
- B. Only the total weight in quintals
- C. The accused's confession
- D. Description and quantity of each item, place and time of recovery, and signatures of the witnesses
Answer: Description and quantity of each item, place and time of recovery, and signatures of the witnesses
Explanation: A seizure memo must permit identification of the exact articles recovered, where and when, in the presence of witnesses, so the chain of custody is provable.
1560. A prosecution case under Section 3 rests entirely on the testimony of RPF personnel who conducted the search; no independent public witness supported it. How does the law view such evidence?
- A. It must be corroborated by a Magistrate's certificate
- B. It is automatically sufficient for conviction
- C. It cannot be discarded merely because the witnesses are officials, but the court scrutinises it carefully
- D. It is inadmissible
Answer: It cannot be discarded merely because the witnesses are officials, but the court scrutinises it carefully
Explanation: The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that official witnesses are competent; absence of independent witnesses goes to weight, not admissibility, though it demands careful scrutiny.
1561. In Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra (1984), the Supreme Court laid down five golden principles ('panchsheel') for convictions based on:
- A. Approver testimony
- B. Circumstantial evidence
- C. Dying declarations
- D. Electronic evidence
Answer: Circumstantial evidence
Explanation: Sarda requires circumstances to be fully established, consistent only with guilt, conclusive in nature and forming a chain leaving no reasonable ground for innocence — a frame often used when possession is the main circumstance.
1562. An accused explains his possession of railway copper wire by a story that is proved false by the prosecution. In law, this false explanation:
- A. Automatically proves the prosecution case
- B. Is irrelevant and must be ignored
- C. Fails to discharge his burden and may be an additional circumstance against him, though it cannot supply a missing link in the prosecution case
- D. Entitles him to acquittal
Answer: Fails to discharge his burden and may be an additional circumstance against him, though it cannot supply a missing link in the prosecution case
Explanation: A false plea may be used as an additional link where the chain is otherwise complete (Sharad Sarda principle), but it cannot be a substitute for proof of the basic facts.
1563. A scrap dealer produces a municipal auction sale-note and a gate-pass for the very lot of condemned rail scrap found in his yard. In the Section 3 proceeding, this evidence is significant because:
- A. It automatically ends the proceeding without any court finding
- B. It is capable of discharging his burden of proving that the property came into his possession lawfully
- C. It proves his guilt of cheating
- D. It only reduces the fine
Answer: It is capable of discharging his burden of proving that the property came into his possession lawfully
Explanation: Documentary proof of lawful acquisition is the standard way for the accused to rebut the s.3 burden; the court must still be satisfied that the documents relate to the same lot.
1564. Stolen railway brake-gear is recovered from a trunk in the accused's room, locked, with the only key on the accused's person. Which conclusion is legally sound?
- A. The facts support exclusive and conscious possession, so the burden of proving lawful acquisition shifts to him
- B. Only the landlord can be in possession
- C. Possession cannot be inferred without his confession
- D. The Section 3 presumption never applies to locked containers
Answer: The facts support exclusive and conscious possession, so the burden of proving lawful acquisition shifts to him
Explanation: Exclusive control over a locked container whose only key is with the accused is classic conscious possession; s.3 then requires him to prove lawful possession.
1565. Stolen rail fish-plates are recovered from an open field that is freely accessible to villagers, 300 metres from the accused's hut, on the basis of no statement by him. Can a Section 3 conviction rest on this recovery alone?
- A. Yes, if the railway administration identifies the plates
- B. No, because possession of the accused is not established where the place is equally accessible to others
- C. Yes, because the recovery was within 500 metres of his hut
- D. Yes, because the presumption automatically makes him liable
Answer: No, because possession of the accused is not established where the place is equally accessible to others
Explanation: The statutory burden under s.3 shifts only after the prosecution proves that the accused was in possession; recovery from a place open to others does not establish his conscious possession.
1566. Under BNSS Section 2(1)(b), 'bail' means:
- A. Compounding of the offence by the complainant
- B. Release of a person accused of or suspected of an offence from the custody of law upon conditions imposed by an officer or court, on execution by him of a bond or bail bond
- C. Final acquittal of the accused
- D. Transfer of the case to another court
Answer: Release of a person accused of or suspected of an offence from the custody of law upon conditions imposed by an officer or court, on execution by him of a bond or bail bond
Explanation: BNSS s.2(1)(b) defines bail as release from the custody of law on conditions imposed by an officer or court on execution of a bond or bail bond.
1567. In which respect does the RPF differ from the Government Railway Police in the enforcement of the RP(UP) Act?
- A. RPF officers conduct the statutory inquiry and arrest under the Act, whereas GRP cannot invoke the Act's special inquiry procedure
- B. GRP alone enforces the Act
- C. They are identical in every respect
- D. The RPF cannot arrest anybody
Answer: RPF officers conduct the statutory inquiry and arrest under the Act, whereas GRP cannot invoke the Act's special inquiry procedure
Explanation: The Act vests the arrest (s.6), forwarding (s.7), inquiry (s.8), summons (s.9) and search (s.10) powers in the Force defined in s.2, not in the State's GRP.
1568. Except in exceptional circumstances, a woman suspect cannot be arrested after sunset and before sunrise. In such an exceptional case, what must the female police officer do?
- A. Inform the station house officer by phone only
- B. Make a written report and obtain the prior permission of the local Judicial Magistrate of the first class
- C. Arrest without any report
- D. Take permission from the Divisional Commandant
Answer: Make a written report and obtain the prior permission of the local Judicial Magistrate of the first class
Explanation: The BNSS (old CrPC s.46(4)) proviso requires a woman police officer's written report and prior permission of the Judicial Magistrate of the first class within whose jurisdiction the arrest is to be made.
1569. Under BNSS Section 35(1), a police officer may arrest without warrant a person in whose possession anything is found which may reasonably be suspected to be stolen property and who may reasonably be suspected of having committed an offence with reference to it. For an RPF officer dealing with railway property, which provision is specific?
- A. Section 351 of the BNSS
- B. Section 6 of the RP(UP) Act
- C. Section 13 of the RP(UP) Act
- D. Section 187 of the BNSS
Answer: Section 6 of the RP(UP) Act
Explanation: Section 6 of the RP(UP) Act is the special power for officers and members of the Force to arrest in railway-property cases, overriding general procedure under s.14.
1570. Under BNSS Section 179 (old CrPC s.160), which of the following persons cannot be required to attend a police station as a witness during investigation?
- A. A woman, a person above sixty, a person under fifteen, or a mentally or physically disabled person
- B. Any person suspected of the offence
- C. Any person above fifteen and below sixty
- D. Any male railway employee below sixty
Answer: A woman, a person above sixty, a person under fifteen, or a mentally or physically disabled person
Explanation: BNSS s.179 protects these classes from compulsory attendance at the police station; they may be examined at their residence.
1571. A statement made to a police officer during investigation and recorded under BNSS Section 180 (old CrPC s.161) cannot, under Section 181 (old CrPC s.162):
- A. Be used as substantive evidence of guilt
- B. Be recorded in any form at all
- C. Be signed by the person making it, and may be used only to contradict the witness in the manner of the Evidence law
- D. Be proved without the Magistrate's order
Answer: Be signed by the person making it, and may be used only to contradict the witness in the manner of the Evidence law
Explanation: BNSS s.181 bars signing of the statement and limits its use to contradiction (and re-examination); it is not substantive evidence.
1572. Under BNSS Section 183 (old CrPC s.164), before recording a confession of an accused who is in RPF or police custody, the Magistrate must first:
- A. Explain that he is not bound to make a confession and that it may be used against him, and satisfy himself that it is voluntary
- B. Administer an oath to the accused
- C. Obtain the arresting officer's opinion
- D. Ask the accused's advocate to leave and the police officer to remain
Answer: Explain that he is not bound to make a confession and that it may be used against him, and satisfy himself that it is voluntary
Explanation: The Magistrate under BNSS s.183 must warn the accused and be satisfied of voluntariness, with no police officer present; only then is the confession admissible under BSA s.23(2).
1573. Under BNSS Section 351 (old CrPC s.313), when the court examines the accused to enable him to explain circumstances appearing against him:
- A. He is examined only by the prosecutor
- B. He is not administered an oath, and he does not render himself liable to punishment by refusing to answer or giving false answers
- C. He is administered an oath and must answer every question
- D. His answers are taken only after conviction
Answer: He is not administered an oath, and he does not render himself liable to punishment by refusing to answer or giving false answers
Explanation: BNSS s.351(3) says no oath is administered and refusal or false answers do not attract punishment; the answers may be taken into consideration in the inquiry or trial.
1574. Under the Seventh Schedule, 'Police (including railway and village police)' falls in which List, which explains why the Government Railway Police is controlled by State Governments?
- A. Union List (Entry 22)
- B. Union List (Entry 99)
- C. Concurrent List (Entry 2)
- D. State List (Entry 2)
Answer: State List (Entry 2)
Explanation: State List Entry 2 covers police including railway police; the RPF, by contrast, is a Union force constituted under the RPF Act, 1957 for protecting railway property.
1575. Under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, a child alleged to be in conflict with law shall be released on bail with or without surety, except where:
- A. There are reasonable grounds to believe release would bring him into association with a known criminal, expose him to danger, or defeat the ends of justice
- B. The child has no parents at home
- C. The complainant objects
- D. The offence is punishable with imprisonment
Answer: There are reasonable grounds to believe release would bring him into association with a known criminal, expose him to danger, or defeat the ends of justice
Explanation: JJ Act s.12 makes bail the rule for a child, with only the three listed exceptions.
1576. Under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, 'heinous offences' are those for which the minimum punishment under any law is imprisonment of:
- A. Ten years or more
- B. Three years or more
- C. One year or more
- D. Seven years or more
Answer: Seven years or more
Explanation: JJ Act s.2(33): heinous offences carry a minimum punishment of seven years or more; since Section 3 of the RP(UP) Act has a minimum of one year, it cannot be a heinous offence.
1577. A 16-year-old boy is found with stolen railway signal wire. The RPF officer apprehends him. Under Section 10 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, the child must be:
- A. Lodged in the police lock-up for 24 hours and then sent to jail
- B. Released with a verbal warning without any record
- C. Placed under the charge of the special juvenile police unit or designated child welfare police officer and produced before the Juvenile Justice Board within 24 hours, not placed in a police lock-up
- D. Produced before the Magistrate's court as an adult
Answer: Placed under the charge of the special juvenile police unit or designated child welfare police officer and produced before the Juvenile Justice Board within 24 hours, not placed in a police lock-up
Explanation: JJ Act s.10 requires production before the Board within 24 hours, excluding journey time, and prohibits placing a child in a police lock-up or lodging him in jail; the Board, not the Magistrate, inquires.
1578. A person shouts and deliberately disrupts a Section 9 inquiry being held by an officer of the Force. Which BNS, 2023 offence is attracted because the inquiry is deemed a judicial proceeding?
- A. Section 305
- B. Section 303
- C. Section 267 (intentional insult or interruption to a public servant sitting in a judicial proceeding; old IPC s.228)
- D. Section 61
Answer: Section 267 (intentional insult or interruption to a public servant sitting in a judicial proceeding; old IPC s.228)
Explanation: BNS s.267 (old IPC s.228) punishes intentional insult or interruption to a public servant sitting in any stage of a judicial proceeding, with up to six months, fine up to five thousand rupees, or both.
1579. Because Section 9(4) deems an inquiry before the RPF officer a 'judicial proceeding', a witness who intentionally gives false evidence in it is liable under which BNS, 2023 provision?
- A. Section 317 (stolen property)
- B. Section 303 (theft)
- C. Section 229 (punishment for false evidence; old IPC s.193)
- D. Section 221 (obstructing a public servant)
Answer: Section 229 (punishment for false evidence; old IPC s.193)
Explanation: The deeming of the inquiry as a judicial proceeding attracts the offence of false evidence, punishable under BNS s.229 (old IPC s.193).
1580. A person summoned under Section 9(3) of the RP(UP) Act is legally bound to:
- A. Attend only if he wishes
- B. Attend as directed and state the truth on the subject examined, and produce documents or things required
- C. Answer only questions about himself
- D. Give a confession
Answer: Attend as directed and state the truth on the subject examined, and produce documents or things required
Explanation: Section 9(3) makes attendance, truthful statement and production of documents mandatory for a summoned person, subject to the privileges preserved by the proviso.
1581. Section 9(1) of the RP(UP) Act authorises the inquiring officer to summon which persons?
- A. Only railway employees
- B. Only persons already arrested
- C. Only persons named in an FIR
- D. Any person whose attendance he considers necessary to give evidence or produce a document or thing
Answer: Any person whose attendance he considers necessary to give evidence or produce a document or thing
Explanation: The summoning power under s.9 is wide and is not confined to the accused or to railway staff.
1582. For the purposes of the Section 8 inquiry, the officer of the Force has the powers of:
- A. A Magistrate of the first class
- B. A Sessions Judge conducting a trial
- C. An officer in charge of a police station investigating a cognizable case
- D. A Station Master under the Railways Act
Answer: An officer in charge of a police station investigating a cognizable case
Explanation: Section 8(2) gives the inquiring RPF officer the same powers and procedure as an officer in charge of a police station investigating a cognizable case, except that he cannot try the accused.
1583. During a Section 8 inquiry, an RPF officer holds there is sufficient evidence against the accused. Which TWO courses does the Act allow him under proviso (a) to Section 8(2)?
- A. Convict him himself, or refer him to the Divisional Commandant
- B. Admit him to bail to appear before the Magistrate, or forward him in custody to the Magistrate
- C. Detain him for 15 days, or hand him to GRP
- D. Fine him on the spot, or warn and release him
Answer: Admit him to bail to appear before the Magistrate, or forward him in custody to the Magistrate
Explanation: The inquiring officer does not try the case; with sufficient evidence he either grants bail for appearance before the Magistrate or forwards the accused in custody.
1584. After a Section 8 inquiry, the RPF officer finds no sufficient evidence or reasonable ground of suspicion against an arrested person. Besides releasing him on a bond to appear before the Magistrate when required, what else must the officer do?
- A. Hand the file to the nearest GRP station
- B. Seek the accused's written apology
- C. Make a full report of the particulars of the case to his official superior
- D. Forward the accused in custody to the Magistrate regardless
Answer: Make a full report of the particulars of the case to his official superior
Explanation: Proviso (b) to s.8(2) requires release on a bond (with or without sureties) and a full report of the case particulars to the official superior, ensuring supervisory accountability for every release.
1585. Under BNSS Section 53 (old CrPC s.54), an arrested person who alleges that examination of his body will afford evidence that he was ill-treated in custody may:
- A. Request the Magistrate to direct examination by a registered medical practitioner
- B. Demand release on bail
- C. Insist on examination only by a police surgeon of his choice
- D. Refuse any production before the Magistrate
Answer: Request the Magistrate to direct examination by a registered medical practitioner
Explanation: BNSS s.53 enables the arrestee to seek a Magistrate's order for medical examination as evidence of ill-treatment, a key safeguard in any RPF custody.
1586. Under BNSS Section 43(3), handcuffs may be used at the time of arrest only for a person who:
- A. Is merely suspected of any offence
- B. Is above sixty years of age
- C. Is a first-time offender of any petty offence
- D. Is a habitual or repeat offender, escaped from custody, or has committed a specified serious offence
Answer: Is a habitual or repeat offender, escaped from custody, or has committed a specified serious offence
Explanation: BNSS s.43(3) limits handcuffing to habitual or repeat offenders, escapees and enumerated serious offences; so a first-time property-offence arrestee should not be handcuffed routinely.
1587. Under BNSS Section 193(3)(ii), the police must inform the victim or informant of the progress of investigation within:
- A. Seven days
- B. Thirty days
- C. Ninety days
- D. One year
Answer: Ninety days
Explanation: BNSS s.193(3)(ii) requires the police to inform the informant or victim of the progress of investigation within 90 days, including by electronic communication.
1588. Under BNSS Section 94 (old CrPC s.91), who may issue a written order requiring a person to produce a document or thing needed for an investigation?
- A. A court or the officer in charge of a police station
- B. Only the Station Master
- C. Only a Sessions Judge
- D. Only the High Court
Answer: A court or the officer in charge of a police station
Explanation: BNSS s.94 lets a court or the officer in charge of a police station summon any person in possession of a document or thing, including electronic communication devices, to produce it.
1589. While a Section 10 search is conducted in a closed godown, the occupier refuses entry. Under BNSS Section 103 (old CrPC s.100), the person in charge of a closed place:
- A. Can demand payment before allowing entry
- B. Must allow free ingress and reasonable facilities on demand, failing which the officer may break open the place
- C. Cannot be compelled to allow entry under any circumstances
- D. May refuse unless a Magistrate is physically present
Answer: Must allow free ingress and reasonable facilities on demand, failing which the officer may break open the place
Explanation: BNSS s.103 obliges the person in charge of a closed place to allow ingress and facilities; if admission cannot be obtained, the officer may break open the door or window after notice.
1590. For an RP(UP) Act offence, a Magistrate takes cognizance on the basis of a report by the RPF officer. Which BNSS provision lists the modes of cognizance by a Magistrate (complaint, police report, information or own knowledge)?
- A. Section 173
- B. Section 210 (old CrPC s.190)
- C. Section 480
- D. Section 193
Answer: Section 210 (old CrPC s.190)
Explanation: BNSS s.210 (CrPC s.190) lists cognizance on a complaint, a police report, information from any person other than a police officer, or the Magistrate's own knowledge.
1591. BNSS Section 185 (old CrPC s.165) governs a search without warrant by an officer in charge of a police station. Which of the following is required?
- A. Recording in writing the grounds of belief and the thing sought, and forwarding a copy forthwith to the nearest Magistrate
- B. A fresh FIR for every search
- C. Prior written sanction of the District Collector
- D. Presence of the accused's advocate
Answer: Recording in writing the grounds of belief and the thing sought, and forwarding a copy forthwith to the nearest Magistrate
Explanation: BNSS s.185 permits warrantless search only when delay would defeat the investigation, with reasons recorded and a copy sent to the nearest Magistrate; the search process must also be audio-video recorded.
1592. When an RPF officer seizes property under BNSS Section 106 (old CrPC s.102) during an RP(UP) Act inquiry, what must he do about the seizure?
- A. Report it only to the railway Divisional Commandant
- B. No report is needed if the value is below a threshold
- C. Wait for the trial to end before reporting
- D. Forthwith report the seizure to the Magistrate having jurisdiction
Answer: Forthwith report the seizure to the Magistrate having jurisdiction
Explanation: BNSS s.106(3) requires the officer seizing property to forthwith report the seizure to the Magistrate having jurisdiction.
1593. Which BNSS, 2023 provision empowers a Magistrate to issue a search warrant for a place used for the deposit or sale of stolen property, the counterpart to the idea behind RP(UP) Act Section 10?
- A. Section 337
- B. Section 35
- C. Section 187
- D. Section 97 (old CrPC s.94)
Answer: Section 97 (old CrPC s.94)
Explanation: BNSS s.97 (CrPC s.94) authorises a Magistrate, on information and inquiry, to issue a warrant to search a place used for deposit or sale of stolen property.
1594. Under BSA Section 23(2), a confession made by a person in police custody can be proved against him only if it is made:
- A. Before any gazetted officer
- B. In the immediate presence of a Magistrate
- C. Before the officer-in-charge of the police station
- D. In the presence of two independent witnesses
Answer: In the immediate presence of a Magistrate
Explanation: BSA s.23(2) (old Evidence Act s.26) excludes custodial confessions unless made in the immediate presence of a Magistrate.
1595. Under BSA Section 23(1) (old Evidence Act s.25), a confession made to a police officer:
- A. Is admissible if recorded in writing
- B. Is admissible if the accused later signs it
- C. Shall not be proved as against a person accused of an offence
- D. Is always admissible if voluntary
Answer: Shall not be proved as against a person accused of an offence
Explanation: BSA s.23(1) absolutely bars proof of a confession to a police officer, whether or not it was voluntary.
1596. Under Section 22 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (old Evidence Act s.24), a confession made by an accused is irrelevant if it appears to the court to have been caused by:
- A. Inducement, threat, coercion or promise from a person in authority
- B. The accused's own remorse
- C. Advice from his advocate
- D. The passage of time
Answer: Inducement, threat, coercion or promise from a person in authority
Explanation: BSA s.22 declares confessions made under inducement, threat, coercion or promise relating to the charge irrelevant in criminal proceedings.
1597. A cleaner physically blocks an RPF officer from seizing railway scrap, thereby obstructing a public servant. Under BNS Section 221, the maximum imprisonment is:
- A. One year
- B. Three years
- C. Three months, or fine, or both
- D. Seven years
Answer: Three months, or fine, or both
Explanation: BNS s.221 (old IPC s.186) punishes voluntary obstruction of a public servant in discharge of public functions with up to three months, fine, or both.
1598. A person already convicted of theft steals railway fittings again. BNS Section 303(2) prescribes for the repeat theft:
- A. Imprisonment up to six months
- B. Death or life imprisonment
- C. Imprisonment up to three years only
- D. Imprisonment of not less than one year which may extend to five years, and fine
Answer: Imprisonment of not less than one year which may extend to five years, and fine
Explanation: The repeat-offender limb of BNS s.303(2) sets a floor of one year and a ceiling of five years with fine.
1599. Under BNS Section 303(2), what is the punishment for simple theft by a person with no previous conviction?
- A. Imprisonment up to three years, or fine, or both (community service for a petty first theft)
- B. Imprisonment of not less than one year
- C. Imprisonment up to seven years
- D. Fine only
Answer: Imprisonment up to three years, or fine, or both (community service for a petty first theft)
Explanation: BNS s.303(2) prescribes up to three years' imprisonment, fine, or both for a first theft; a repeat theft after conviction carries 1 to 5 years and fine.
1600. A scrap dealer who habitually deals in stolen railway metal is charged under BNS Section 317(4). The maximum punishment is:
- A. Three years
- B. Seven years only
- C. Imprisonment for life, or up to ten years, with fine
- D. Five years without fine
Answer: Imprisonment for life, or up to ten years, with fine
Explanation: BNS s.317(4) (old IPC s.413) punishes habitual dealers in stolen property with life imprisonment or up to ten years and fine.