👥 Exam-preparation support for aspirants across India.🔔 Free UPSC syllabus, quizzes and class videos.✓ SSC CGL eligibility guide is live in Vidyarthi Kendra.
IUC Academy logoIUC AcademyHome

RPF Sub-Inspector Promotion Examination MCQ Practice

Practice question set with answers. Use deep links to save questions.

Quiz App / RPF Sub-Inspector Promotion Examination

5009 questions loaded. Showing page 22 of 63 for fast crawlable revision and deep linking.

1681. A person summoned by an officer of the Force under Section 9 sends his authorised agent instead. Per Section 9(3), this is permissible when:
  1. A. The agent is a practising advocate
  2. B. The person has paid a security deposit
  3. C. The officer directs that attendance may be in person or by an authorised agent
  4. D. The summons concerns only money
Answer: The officer directs that attendance may be in person or by an authorised agent
Explanation: Persons summoned are bound to attend 'either in person or by an authorized agent as such officer may direct'.

1682. Under Section 9(2), a summons to produce documents may call for:

  1. A. Only documents of a bank
  2. B. Only documents already filed in a court
  3. C. Only originals of registered documents
  4. D. Certain specified documents, or all documents of a certain description in the possession or control of the person summoned
Answer: Certain specified documents, or all documents of a certain description in the possession or control of the person summoned
Explanation: Section 9(2) permits a summons for specified documents or things, or for all documents or things of a certain description in the possession or under the control of the person summoned.
1683. Section 9(1) of the RP(UP) Act authorises the officer of the Force to summon a person whose attendance he considers necessary for which purposes?
  1. A. Only to furnish sureties for a bond
  2. B. Only to give evidence in open court
  3. C. Only to identify stolen property at the police station
  4. D. To give evidence, or to produce a document or any other thing, for the purposes of the Act
Answer: To give evidence, or to produce a document or any other thing, for the purposes of the Act
Explanation: Section 9(1): power to summon any person whose attendance is considered necessary either to give evidence or to produce a document or any other thing for the purposes of the Act.
1684. The statutory bar on confessions made to a police officer, found in Section 25 of the Evidence Act, 1872, corresponds to which provision of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023?
  1. A. Section 109
  2. B. Section 21
  3. C. Section 119
  4. D. Section 23(1)
Answer: Section 23(1)
Explanation: BSA s.23(1) re-enacts Evidence Act s.25 (no confession to a police officer is provable against the accused), and s.23(2) corresponds to s.26 with the s.27 discovery saving.
1685. In Balkishan A. Devidayal v. State of Maharashtra ((1980) 4 SCC 600) the Supreme Court held that an RPF officer conducting an inquiry under Section 8(1) of the RP(UP) Act is:
  1. A. A police officer whose recorded statements are wholly inadmissible
  2. B. Not a 'police officer' within the meaning of Section 25 of the Evidence Act
  3. C. A civil court officer under the Code of Civil Procedure
  4. D. A Magistrate for purposes of recording confessions
Answer: Not a 'police officer' within the meaning of Section 25 of the Evidence Act
Explanation: Balkishan Devidayal held that an RPF officer inquiring under s.8(1) is not a police officer for s.25 of the Evidence Act (now BSA s.23(1)), so statements made to him are not barred merely on that ground.
1686. Under proviso (a) to Section 8(2), when sufficient evidence or reasonable ground of suspicion exists, the officer of the Force has which two options?
  1. A. Commit him to the Sessions Court, or release him on his word
  2. B. Release him on personal bond, or convert the case into a civil recovery
  3. C. Admit the accused to bail to appear before the Magistrate, or forward him in custody to the Magistrate
  4. D. Remand him for 15 days himself, or hand him to the local police
Answer: Admit the accused to bail to appear before the Magistrate, or forward him in custody to the Magistrate
Explanation: Proviso (a): the officer shall either admit him to bail to appear before the Magistrate having jurisdiction, or forward him in custody to such Magistrate.
1687. Under the proviso (b) to Section 8(2), if the officer finds insufficient evidence or reasonable ground of suspicion against the arrested person, he must:
  1. A. Release him unconditionally without any record
  2. B. Release the person on a bond, with or without sureties, to appear before the Magistrate when required, and report fully to his official superior
  3. C. Hold him for 24 hours and then free him by oral order
  4. D. Forward him to the Magistrate in custody regardless
Answer: Release the person on a bond, with or without sureties, to appear before the Magistrate when required, and report fully to his official superior
Explanation: Proviso (b): release on executing a bond, with or without sureties as the officer directs, to appear before the Magistrate having jurisdiction if and when required, and make a full report of all particulars to his official superior.
1688. For the Section 8 inquiry, what procedural law governs the officer of the Force according to Section 8(2)?
  1. A. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 applicable to civil courts
  2. B. The Railways Act inquiry rules for accidents
  3. C. The Indian Evidence Act rules for Magistrate trials
  4. D. The same powers and provisions as an officer in charge of a police station investigating a cognizable case under the Code of Criminal Procedure
Answer: The same powers and provisions as an officer in charge of a police station investigating a cognizable case under the Code of Criminal Procedure
Explanation: Section 8(2) places the officer of the Force in the position of an officer in charge of a police station investigating a cognizable case, even though the offence itself is non-cognizable.
1689. Under Section 8(1), the duty to inquire into the charge arises in which two situations?
  1. A. When a person is arrested by an officer of the Force, or is forwarded to him under Section 7
  2. B. When bail is granted, or when the accused surrenders
  3. C. When property is seized under Section 10, or a summons is issued under Section 9
  4. D. When a complaint is filed before a Magistrate, or a warrant is issued
Answer: When a person is arrested by an officer of the Force, or is forwarded to him under Section 7
Explanation: Section 8(1): when any person is arrested by an officer of the Force for an offence under the Act, or is forwarded to him under section 7, he shall proceed to inquire into the charge.
1690. An Assistant Sub-Inspector of the RPF himself arrests a man for suspected possession of railway brake blocks. Is he bound by Section 7 to forward the man to another officer of the Force?
  1. A. Yes, because only an Inspector may inquire
  2. B. Yes, because every arrest must be forwarded to the Magistrate through a superior officer
  3. C. No, because he must release the man at once on a bond
  4. D. No, because Section 7 applies only where the arrest is made by a person other than an officer of the Force; he proceeds to inquire under Section 8(1)
Answer: No, because Section 7 applies only where the arrest is made by a person other than an officer of the Force; he proceeds to inquire under Section 8(1)
Explanation: An ASI is an 'officer of the Force'. Section 7 forwarding applies only to arrests made by a person who is not an officer of the Force; section 8(1) directly requires the arresting officer to inquire.
1691. Section 6 empowers arrest 'without an order from a Magistrate and without a warrant'. Who may use this power?
  1. A. Any superior officer or member of the Force
  2. B. Only a Railway Magistrate
  3. C. Only the Station House Officer of the local police
  4. D. Only an officer of the Force of the rank of Inspector or above
Answer: Any superior officer or member of the Force
Explanation: The arrest power is vested widely in 'any superior officer or member of the Force' - so even a constable (a member) may arrest, whereas inquiry is reserved for an officer of the Force.
1692. Section 6 of the RP(UP) Act permits arrest on which two alternative grounds?
  1. A. The person is a habitual offender, or has been previously convicted
  2. B. The person has obstructed an officer, or has escaped from custody
  3. C. The person is absconding, or has refused to give his name
  4. D. The person has been concerned in an offence under the Act, or a reasonable suspicion exists of his having been so concerned
Answer: The person has been concerned in an offence under the Act, or a reasonable suspicion exists of his having been so concerned
Explanation: Section 6: arrest of any person 'who has been concerned in an offence punishable under this Act or against whom a reasonable suspicion exists of his having been so concerned'.
1693. Section 5 of the RP(UP) Act declares offences non-cognizable 'notwithstanding anything contained in' which Code, as the Act's text stands?
  1. A. The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
  2. B. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
  3. C. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898
  4. D. The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Answer: The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898
Explanation: The Act, enacted in 1966, refers to the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898; today such references are read as references to the BNSS, 2023 (via the General Clauses/BNSS savings).
1694. What is the sentencing structure of Section 4 compared with Section 3?
  1. A. Minimum two years and minimum fine Rs. 2,000
  2. B. Up to five years, or fine, or both, with no minimum sentence
  3. C. Minimum one year and minimum fine Rs. 1,000
  4. D. Imprisonment up to three years only, without fine
Answer: Up to five years, or fine, or both, with no minimum sentence
Explanation: Section 4 prescribes imprisonment which may extend to five years, or fine, or both; unlike Section 3 it has no mandatory minimum, and a fine-only sentence is possible.

1695. Section 4 of the RP(UP) Act punishes a person who:

  1. A. Obstructs an officer of the Force in his duty
  2. B. Abets any person to hold railway property
  3. C. Gives false information to an officer of the Force
  4. D. Being owner or occupier of land or building, or its managing agent, wilfully connives at an offence against the Act
Answer: Being owner or occupier of land or building, or its managing agent, wilfully connives at an offence against the Act
Explanation: Section 4 is titled 'Punishment for connivance of offences' and is confined to wilful connivance by an owner, occupier or the agent in charge of managing the land or building.
1696. The words 'unless he proves that the railway property came into his possession lawfully' in Section 3 mean that:
  1. A. The magistrate must presume possession was lawful
  2. B. The accused must prove his innocence beyond reasonable doubt
  3. C. The onus of proving lawful possession lies on the accused once the foundational facts are established
  4. D. The prosecution must additionally prove dishonest intention
Answer: The onus of proving lawful possession lies on the accused once the foundational facts are established
Explanation: The statutory exception puts the burden of explaining lawful acquisition on the accused after the prosecution proves the three ingredients.
1697. Where can the court record the 'special and adequate reasons' for awarding less than the minimum sentence under Section 3?
  1. A. In the charge-sheet
  2. B. In the judgment itself
  3. C. In a separate confidential note to the High Court
  4. D. In the order sheet of the first hearing
Answer: In the judgment itself
Explanation: Section 3 requires the special and adequate reasons to be 'mentioned in the judgment of the court'.
1698. For a first offence under Section 3, the court sentences the accused only to a fine of Rs. 5,000 and no imprisonment, recording nothing about reasons. This is:
  1. A. Not permissible, since in the absence of special and adequate reasons imprisonment of at least one year is mandatory
  2. B. Permissible if the accused is a railway employee
  3. C. Permissible only if the fine exceeds Rs. 10,000
  4. D. Permissible, as the first offence allows fine alone as of right
Answer: Not permissible, since in the absence of special and adequate reasons imprisonment of at least one year is mandatory
Explanation: Although the first-offence clause says 'imprisonment, or fine, or both', the proviso-like floor makes imprisonment of not less than one year compulsory unless special and adequate reasons are recorded in the judgment.
1699. A repeat offender under Section 3 is sentenced to eighteen months' imprisonment and Rs. 2,000 fine, with no special reasons recorded. What is the legal position?
  1. A. The sentence is valid because maximum is five years
  2. B. The imprisonment is below the two-year minimum for a second offence, so the sentence is not sustainable
  3. C. The sentence is valid since fine is at the minimum
  4. D. The sentence is invalid because fine must be Rs. 5,000
Answer: The imprisonment is below the two-year minimum for a second offence, so the sentence is not sustainable
Explanation: For a second or subsequent offence the minimum is two years' imprisonment and Rs. 2,000 fine unless special and adequate reasons are mentioned in the judgment. Eighteen months with no reasons falls short.
1700. A first offender is convicted under Section 3. The court imposes exactly one year's imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1,000 without recording any special reasons. The sentence is:
  1. A. Valid, as it meets both statutory minimums
  2. B. Invalid, as imprisonment and fine cannot be combined for a first offence
  3. C. Invalid, as the minimum imprisonment is two years
  4. D. Invalid, as the minimum fine is Rs. 5,000
Answer: Valid, as it meets both statutory minimums
Explanation: For a first offence the floor (absent recorded special reasons) is one year's imprisonment and Rs. 1,000 fine. The sentence imposed sits exactly at that floor, so it is valid.
1701. Which of the following is NOT among the ingredients of Section 3 as enumerated in Vishwanath Tukaram?
  1. A. The accused was found or proved to have been in possession of it
  2. B. The property is reasonably suspected of having been stolen or unlawfully obtained
  3. C. The property is railway property
  4. D. Proof that the accused himself committed the original theft
Answer: Proof that the accused himself committed the original theft
Explanation: Section 3 punishes possession of suspected property; the prosecution need not prove who committed the original theft. That is why it is a useful provision against receivers and scrap traders.
1702. State of Maharashtra v. Vishwanath Tukaram ((1979) 4 SCC 23) laid down how many ingredients of the Section 3 offence?
  1. A. Five
  2. B. Two
  3. C. Three
  4. D. Four
Answer: Three
Explanation: The three ingredients: (i) the property is railway property, (ii) it is reasonably suspected of having been stolen or unlawfully obtained, and (iii) the accused is found or proved to have been in possession of it.
1703. The Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 bears which Act number and what is the date given beneath its title?
  1. A. Act No. 29 of 1966; 16 September 1966
  2. B. Act No. 23 of 1966; 16 September 1966
  3. C. Act No. 23 of 1957; 16 September 1957
  4. D. Act No. 29 of 1966; 1 April 1968
Answer: Act No. 29 of 1966; 16 September 1966
Explanation: The RP(UP) Act is Act 29 of 1966, dated 16 September 1966 (assent). Act 23 of 1957 is the RPF Act. The 1 April 1968 date is when it was brought into force by notification.
1704. A word used in the RP(UP) Act, 1966 but not defined in it, and defined in the Indian Railways Act, 1890, takes its meaning from which source according to Section 2(f)?
  1. A. The meaning assigned to it in the Indian Railways Act, 1890
  2. B. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898
  3. C. The Railway Protection Force Act, 1957 only
  4. D. The General Clauses Act, 1897 only
Answer: The meaning assigned to it in the Indian Railways Act, 1890
Explanation: Section 2(f) imports the meanings of terms defined in the Indian Railways Act, 1890 (e.g., 'railway administration'). The reference is read today as to the Railways Act, 1989.
1705. Section 2(e) defines 'superior officer' by reference to officers appointed under which provision, and what else does it cover?
  1. A. Section 6 of the RPF Act, 1957, plus any Inspector confirmed in service
  2. B. Section 4 of the RPF Act, 1957, plus any other officer appointed by the Central Government as a superior officer of the Force
  3. C. Section 11 of the RPF Act, 1957, plus any officer designated by a Divisional Railway Manager
  4. D. Section 3 of the RPF Act, 1957, plus any officer of the rank of Sub-Inspector
Answer: Section 4 of the RPF Act, 1957, plus any other officer appointed by the Central Government as a superior officer of the Force
Explanation: Section 2(e): 'superior officer' means any officer appointed under Section 4 of the RPF Act, 1957, and includes any other officer appointed by the Central Government as a superior officer of the Force.
1706. Section 2(c) of the RP(UP) Act, 1966 provides that 'officer of the Force' includes which of the following in addition to officers of and above the rank of ASI?
  1. A. Any gazetted railway commercial officer
  2. B. A superior officer
  3. C. Any state police officer deputed to the Force
  4. D. A Head Constable with over ten years' service
Answer: A superior officer
Explanation: Clause (c) says 'officer of the Force' means an officer of and above the rank of Assistant Sub-Inspector appointed to the Force 'and includes a superior officer'. Length of service plays no role.
1707. An Assistant Sub-Inspector of the RPF stands in which position under Section 2 of the RP(UP) Act?
  1. A. He is neither a 'member' nor an 'officer' of the Force
  2. B. He is both a 'member of the Force' and an 'officer of the Force'
  3. C. He is an 'officer of the Force' but not a 'member of the Force'
  4. D. He is a 'superior officer' by virtue of rank alone
Answer: He is both a 'member of the Force' and an 'officer of the Force'
Explanation: An ASI is appointed to the Force and is not a superior officer, so he is a member (s.2(b)); he also holds the rank of ASI or above, so he is an officer of the Force (s.2(c)). Hence he can arrest under s.6 and conduct a s.8 inquiry.
1708. Under Section 2(b) of the RP(UP) Act, 1966, which category of RPF personnel is expressly excluded from the term 'member of the Force'?
  1. A. A superior officer
  2. B. An Assistant Sub-Inspector
  3. C. A Naik or Lance Naik
  4. D. A Head Constable
Answer: A superior officer
Explanation: Section 2(b) defines 'member of the Force' as a person appointed to the Force 'other than a superior officer'. Ranks from constable up to ASI therefore are members; superior officers are carved out.
1709. The officers of the Force who make an arrest under Section 6 must produce the arrested person, if not released, before the Magistrate. Who is a 'competent Magistrate' for Section 8 forwarding?
  1. A. Only a High Court Judge
  2. B. Only the Chief Judicial Magistrate of the State capital
  3. C. Any Magistrate in India
  4. D. The Magistrate having jurisdiction to try the case or commit it for trial
Answer: The Magistrate having jurisdiction to try the case or commit it for trial
Explanation: Section 8 refers to forwarding to a Magistrate having jurisdiction in the case; practical remand under BNSS Section 187 can be given by the nearest Magistrate.
1710. Which of the following offences under the RP(UP) Act is a Magistrate empowered to take cognizance of on a private complaint, despite non-cognizability?
  1. A. Only offences punishable under Section 4
  2. B. All offences under the Act, by virtue of BNSS Section 210(1)(a)
  3. C. Only offences by railway employees
  4. D. None, as only the police may complain
Answer: All offences under the Act, by virtue of BNSS Section 210(1)(a)
Explanation: Any Magistrate can take cognizance of an offence upon receiving a complaint of the facts (BNSS Section 210(1)(a), CrPC 190(1)(a)); non-cognizability only affects police investigation without a Magistrate's order.
1711. A Station Master finds a man loading goods marked 'N.Rly' on a cart at midnight. Can the Station Master himself arrest him under Section 6?
  1. A. No, nobody may arrest without warrant
  2. B. Yes, every railway employee has Section 6 power
  3. C. No, Section 6 is vested in a superior officer or member of the Force; the Station Master may detain and hand him over under Section 7
  4. D. Yes, but only after the Magistrate's order
Answer: No, Section 6 is vested in a superior officer or member of the Force; the Station Master may detain and hand him over under Section 7
Explanation: The Section 6 power is confined to superior officers and members of the Force. Other persons act as in Section 7, forwarding the arrested person to the nearest officer of the Force.
1712. A person is arrested by the RPF on suspicion under Section 3. Which of the following Sections would be the correct statutory basis for the arrest?
  1. A. Section 8 of the RP(UP) Act
  2. B. Section 13 of the RP(UP) Act
  3. C. Section 10 of the RP(UP) Act
  4. D. Section 6 of the RP(UP) Act
Answer: Section 6 of the RP(UP) Act
Explanation: The arrest power lies in Section 6; Section 8 is for inquiry, Section 10 for search warrants and Section 13 for forfeiture.
1713. Arrange the Act's stages in the correct order of enforcement: (1) Section 6 arrest (2) Section 7 forwarding (3) Section 8 inquiry (4) Section 10 warrant for search of a godown.
  1. A. 2, 1, 4, 3
  2. B. 4, 3, 2, 1
  3. C. 1, 2, 3, then 4 (if the inquiry points to a godown)
  4. D. 3, 1, 4, 2
Answer: 1, 2, 3, then 4 (if the inquiry points to a godown)
Explanation: Arrest (Section 6) is followed by forwarding to an officer (Section 7) and the inquiry (Section 8); if the inquiry shows a depository of stolen property, the officer applies for a Section 10 warrant.

1714. Section 14 of the RP(UP) Act opens with which type of clause?

  1. A. A non-obstante clause
  2. B. A sunset clause
  3. C. A proviso
  4. D. A definition clause
Answer: A non-obstante clause
Explanation: Section 14 provides that the provisions of the Act have effect 'notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law', which is a non obstante clause.
1715. Section 14 of the RP(UP) Act, giving the Act overriding effect, applies in respect of provisions that are:
  1. A. Contained in the Constitution
  2. B. Contained in State Police Manuals only
  3. C. Contained in the Railways Act only
  4. D. Inconsistent with the Act contained in any other law for the time being in force
Answer: Inconsistent with the Act contained in any other law for the time being in force
Explanation: Section 14 gives the Act effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent in any other law in force; it cannot override the Constitution.
1716. A truck owner's vehicle was used by the accused to carry stolen railway rails. Against a forfeiture order under Section 13, the truck owner's best argument is that:
  1. A. The order can be made only by the High Court
  2. B. Only the owner of the goods can seek forfeiture
  3. C. Vehicles can never be forfeited
  4. D. He had no knowledge or connivance and the vehicle was used without his knowledge, so the Court should consider this before ordering forfeiture
Answer: He had no knowledge or connivance and the vehicle was used without his knowledge, so the Court should consider this before ordering forfeiture
Explanation: Section 13 says the Court 'may' order forfeiture, so it is discretionary; an innocent owner can be heard on his lack of knowledge, as the power is not to punish third parties.
1717. Section 13 of the RP(UP) Act empowers a Court trying an offence under the Act to order forfeiture to Government of:
  1. A. Only the property involved
  2. B. The property involved, its packaging and any animal or vehicle used in carrying it
  3. C. Only the vehicle
  4. D. The accused's entire estate
Answer: The property involved, its packaging and any animal or vehicle used in carrying it
Explanation: Section 13 extends forfeiture beyond the stolen goods to their package, covering or receptacle and to the animal or vehicle used to carry them.
1718. A village patwari refuses to disclose land records needed by an RPF officer to trace a godown owner in an inquiry. His refusal is contrary to:
  1. A. Section 13 of the RP(UP) Act
  2. B. Section 5 of the RP(UP) Act
  3. C. Section 14 of the RP(UP) Act
  4. D. Section 12 of the RP(UP) Act, the duty of village officers to assist
Answer: Section 12 of the RP(UP) Act, the duty of village officers to assist
Explanation: Village officers (such as patwaris and revenue officials) are expressly bound by Section 12 to assist the officers of the Force.
1719. Section 12 of the RP(UP) Act places a duty to assist the officers of the Force on:
  1. A. Only advocates
  2. B. Only railway employees
  3. C. Only members of the public with an RPF identity card
  4. D. All Government officers and village officers
Answer: All Government officers and village officers
Explanation: Section 12 binds all Government officers and village officers to assist the Force's officials in enforcing the Act.
1720. BNSS Section 105 requires that the process of search and seizure be recorded through:
  1. A. A press note
  2. B. Handwritten notes only
  3. C. A sketch map only
  4. D. Audio-video electronic means, preferably a mobile phone
Answer: Audio-video electronic means, preferably a mobile phone
Explanation: BNSS Section 105 makes audio-video recording of search and seizure mandatory; as Section 11 of the RP(UP) Act applies the general procedure, RPF searches under the Act follow it.
1721. In a Section 10 search, to comply with BNSS Section 103 (via RP(UP) Section 11), the search should be made in the presence of:
  1. A. Only the officer's own subordinates
  2. B. The Station Master only
  3. C. The press
  4. D. Two or more independent and respectable inhabitants of the locality
Answer: Two or more independent and respectable inhabitants of the locality
Explanation: Under the general search procedure (CrPC 100, now BNSS 103) the search is made in the presence of two independent and respectable inhabitants of the locality, and a list of seized items is prepared.
1722. Under Section 11 of the RP(UP) Act, searches and arrests under the Act are to be carried out in accordance with:
  1. A. Railway Board circulars alone
  2. B. RPF Rules alone
  3. C. The provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure (now BNSS) relating to searches and arrests
  4. D. Orders of the Station Master
Answer: The provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure (now BNSS) relating to searches and arrests
Explanation: Section 11 imports the general procedural safeguards of the Cr.P.C. (now BNSS) for searches and arrests made under the Act.
1723. Unlike arrest under Section 6, search of premises under Section 10 requires:
  1. A. Nothing, as the Force may search at will
  2. B. Permission of the Station Master
  3. C. A warrant from a Magistrate
  4. D. A Magistrate's order only for night searches
Answer: A warrant from a Magistrate
Explanation: Arrest under Section 6 is without warrant, but entering and searching private premises under the Act needs a Magistrate's warrant under Section 10.
1724. After seizing the property under a Section 10 warrant, the officer may, as authorised by the warrant:
  1. A. Return it to the occupier
  2. B. Auction it immediately
  3. C. Destroy it as evidence
  4. D. Convey it before a Magistrate, or guard it on the spot until the offender is taken before a Magistrate, or otherwise dispose of it in a place of safety
Answer: Convey it before a Magistrate, or guard it on the spot until the offender is taken before a Magistrate, or otherwise dispose of it in a place of safety
Explanation: Section 10(2) lists the three modes of dealing with seized goods: convey before a Magistrate; guard on the spot until the offender is produced; or dispose of in a place of safety.
1725. A Section 10 search warrant authorises the officer to do which of the following?
  1. A. Enter with needed assistance, search, and seize railway property reasonably suspected to be stolen or unlawfully obtained
  2. B. Demolish the building
  3. C. Arrest every person in the locality
  4. D. Attach the owner's bank account
Answer: Enter with needed assistance, search, and seize railway property reasonably suspected to be stolen or unlawfully obtained
Explanation: The warrant allows entry with such assistance as is required, search of the place and seizure of railway property reasonably suspected to have been stolen or unlawfully obtained.
1726. The standard of belief required of the officer for applying for a Section 10 search warrant is:
  1. A. Reason to believe that the place is used for deposit or sale of stolen or unlawfully obtained railway property
  2. B. Proof beyond reasonable doubt
  3. C. A confession by the owner
  4. D. Absolute certainty of guilt
Answer: Reason to believe that the place is used for deposit or sale of stolen or unlawfully obtained railway property
Explanation: Section 10(1) turns on 'reason to believe', an objective but pre-trial standard; certainty or proof is not needed to apply for a warrant.
1727. An officer of the Force believes that a godown near the yard is used to deposit stolen railway property. What must he do under Section 10 to search it?
  1. A. Enter at once on the Station Master's permission
  2. B. Apply to the Magistrate having jurisdiction for a search warrant
  3. C. Ask the nearest village officer to search
  4. D. Seek an order from the Railway Board
Answer: Apply to the Magistrate having jurisdiction for a search warrant
Explanation: Section 10 requires the officer, on reason to believe that a place is used for deposit or sale of stolen or unlawfully obtained railway property, to apply to the Magistrate for a search warrant.
1728. A witness lies in his statement before the Force officer in a Section 8 inquiry. He may be prosecuted for giving false evidence in a judicial proceeding because Section 9:
  1. A. Makes every statement an oath-bound deposition in court
  2. B. Deems the inquiry a judicial proceeding for those provisions
  3. C. Exempts the witness from the oath
  4. D. Converts the officer into a Magistrate
Answer: Deems the inquiry a judicial proceeding for those provisions
Explanation: The legal fiction applies only for the specified IPC/BNS provisions; the officer does not become a court, but a lie told to him is punishable as false evidence.
1729. Under Section 9, a proceeding before the inquiring officer is deemed a 'judicial proceeding' for the purposes of which offences of the IPC (now corresponding BNS provisions)?
  1. A. Sections 193 and 228 IPC (false evidence; insult or interruption to a public servant in judicial proceeding)
  2. B. Sections 302 and 304 IPC
  3. C. Sections 420 and 468 IPC
  4. D. Sections 379 and 411 IPC
Answer: Sections 193 and 228 IPC (false evidence; insult or interruption to a public servant in judicial proceeding)
Explanation: Section 9 deems the inquiry a judicial proceeding for IPC Sections 193 and 228 (corresponding to BNS Sections 229 and 267), so false evidence and insult to the inquiring officer are punishable.
1730. Which Sections of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 are applied by Section 9 of the RP(UP) Act for exemption from personal attendance?
  1. A. Sections 80 and 89
  2. B. Sections 100 and 115
  3. C. Sections 10 and 11
  4. D. Sections 132 and 133
Answer: Sections 132 and 133
Explanation: Sections 132 (exemption of certain women) and 133 (exemption of other persons) of the CPC govern exemptions from personal appearance under summons issued in the inquiry.
1731. A person summoned under Section 9 attends and the officer records his statement. What duty does Section 9 cast on a summoned person?
  1. A. To attend and to state the truth on the subject of examination
  2. B. To pay a fee for the summons
  3. C. To attend only if accompanied by a lawyer
  4. D. To attend but he may remain silent on everything
Answer: To attend and to state the truth on the subject of examination
Explanation: A summoned person is bound to attend and to state the truth on the subject on which he is examined (subject to constitutional privilege against self-incrimination under Article 20(3)).
1732. Section 9 of the RP(UP) Act empowers an officer of the Force holding an inquiry to:
  1. A. Summon any person to give evidence or produce a document or thing
  2. B. Try the accused summarily
  3. C. Grant anticipatory bail
  4. D. Award compensation
Answer: Summon any person to give evidence or produce a document or thing
Explanation: Section 9 lets the inquiring officer summon persons whose attendance is needed to give evidence, or to produce documents or things relevant to the inquiry.
1733. An RPF officer arrests a suspect under Section 6. Under BNSS Section 47 (CrPC 50), the person must be informed of:
  1. A. Only his name and father's name
  2. B. The full particulars of the offence and the grounds of arrest
  3. C. The salary of the arresting officer
  4. D. The cost of the proceeding
Answer: The full particulars of the offence and the grounds of arrest
Explanation: Article 22(1) and BNSS Section 47 require that the arrested person be informed of the grounds of arrest; Section 11 of the RP(UP) Act applies the general procedure to arrests under the Act.
1734. The Section 8 officer, after inquiry, decides to forward the arrested person to the Magistrate in custody. Constitutional and BNSS time-limits then require production within:
  1. A. 15 days of arrest
  2. B. 24 hours of arrest, excluding journey time
  3. C. 48 hours of arrest
  4. D. 7 days of arrest
Answer: 24 hours of arrest, excluding journey time
Explanation: Article 22(2) of the Constitution and BNSS Section 58 (CrPC 57) require production before the nearest Magistrate within 24 hours of arrest, excluding the journey time; the Act's inquiry does not extend that period.
1735. An RPF head constable arrests a man with railway cable. Can the same head constable himself conduct the Section 8 inquiry?
  1. A. Yes, if the Magistrate allows
  2. B. Yes, any member of the Force may inquire
  3. C. No, he must forward the person to an officer of the Force (ASI or above) who inquires
  4. D. No, only the Director-General can inquire
Answer: No, he must forward the person to an officer of the Force (ASI or above) who inquires
Explanation: A head constable is a 'member', not an 'officer', of the Force. He may arrest under Section 6, but the person is forwarded under Section 7 to an officer of the Force for inquiry under Section 8.
1736. Which statement correctly compares the arrest power (Section 6) and the inquiry power (Section 8) by reference to who can exercise them?
  1. A. Both are exercisable only by the Director-General
  2. B. Arrest only by an officer; inquiry by any member
  3. C. Arrest by any superior officer or member; inquiry by an officer of the Force
  4. D. Both are exercisable by any constable
Answer: Arrest by any superior officer or member; inquiry by an officer of the Force
Explanation: Section 6 empowers any superior officer or member, while the Section 8 inquiry is for an officer of the Force (ASI or above). The rank threshold is the reason the Act separately defines 'officer' and 'member'.
1737. For an inquiry under Section 8, the officer of the Force exercises the powers of:
  1. A. A Judicial Magistrate of the first class
  2. B. A Sessions Judge
  3. C. An officer in charge of a police station investigating a cognizable case
  4. D. A Collector
Answer: An officer in charge of a police station investigating a cognizable case
Explanation: The inquiry powers are modelled on those of a station house officer investigating a cognizable offence, notwithstanding that the offence itself is non-cognizable.
1738. If the Section 8 inquiry discloses no sufficient evidence or reasonable ground of suspicion, the officer of the Force shall:
  1. A. Detain him for 15 days
  2. B. Hand him to the State police
  3. C. Forward him in custody to the Magistrate anyway
  4. D. Release the person on a bond and report to the superior officer
Answer: Release the person on a bond and report to the superior officer
Explanation: Where evidence is insufficient the person is released on executing a bond and the full particulars are reported to the official superior, preserving accountability for the decision.
1739. If, after the Section 8 inquiry, there is sufficient evidence or reasonable ground of suspicion against the arrested person, the officer of the Force shall:
  1. A. Order him to be dismissed from service
  2. B. Fine him on the spot
  3. C. Admit him to bail to appear before the Magistrate, or forward him in custody to the Magistrate
  4. D. Close the file and issue a caution
Answer: Admit him to bail to appear before the Magistrate, or forward him in custody to the Magistrate
Explanation: Section 8 gives two options when evidence or reasonable suspicion exists: release on bail to appear before the competent Magistrate, or forward in custody to that Magistrate.
1740. Section 8 of the RP(UP) Act describes the officer's role on receipt of information of an offence or on receiving an arrested person as:
  1. A. Passing sentence
  2. B. Compounding the offence
  3. C. Inquiring into the charge against the person
  4. D. Trying the offence summarily
Answer: Inquiring into the charge against the person
Explanation: The officer of the Force must proceed to inquire into the charge; he is a pre-trial inquiring authority, not a court, and cannot convict, sentence or compound.
1741. A private railway cleaner catches a man pulling out brake-gear and holds him. Under the Act, he must:
  1. A. Release him at the next station
  2. B. Keep him until morning
  3. C. Forward him without delay to the nearest officer of the Force
  4. D. File a complaint with the Railway Board
Answer: Forward him without delay to the nearest officer of the Force
Explanation: Section 7 covers arrests made by persons other than officers of the Force; they must forward the arrested person without delay to the nearest officer of the Force.
1742. An RPF constable arrests a suspect on the platform for possessing railway fittings. What must he do next under Section 7?
  1. A. Hand him to the Station Master
  2. B. Forward him without delay to the nearest officer of the Force
  3. C. Release him after a warning
  4. D. Produce him before the Railway Board
Answer: Forward him without delay to the nearest officer of the Force
Explanation: Section 7 requires a person arrested by someone other than an officer of the Force (for example a constable) to be forwarded without delay to the nearest officer of the Force, who then conducts the inquiry under Section 8.

1743. Who can exercise the Section 6 power of arrest without warrant?

  1. A. Any superior officer or member of the Force
  2. B. Only an 'officer of the Force' of ASI rank or above
  3. C. Only a Magistrate
  4. D. Only the Station Master of the railway station concerned
Answer: Any superior officer or member of the Force
Explanation: Section 6 is wider than the inquiry power: it is vested in 'any superior officer or member of the Force', so even a constable can arrest, then must forward the person to an officer of the Force.
1744. Section 6 of the RP(UP) Act authorises arrest of a person who has been concerned in an offence, or against whom a reasonable suspicion exists. Which statement about the order required is correct?
  1. A. Neither a Magistrate's order nor a warrant is required
  2. B. A Magistrate's order is required but a warrant is not
  3. C. Both a warrant and a Magistrate's order are required
  4. D. A warrant is required but a Magistrate's order is not
Answer: Neither a Magistrate's order nor a warrant is required
Explanation: Section 6 says the arrest may be made 'without an order from a Magistrate and without a warrant', which is the special departure from the rule for non-cognizable offences.
1745. Because an RP(UP) Act offence is non-cognizable, an ordinary police officer who gets information of it should, under BNSS Section 174, first:
  1. A. Transfer the case to the Railway Board
  2. B. Register an FIR and arrest without a warrant
  3. C. Investigate without any order
  4. D. Enter the substance in the prescribed book and refer the informant to the Magistrate
Answer: Enter the substance in the prescribed book and refer the informant to the Magistrate
Explanation: For a non-cognizable offence BNSS Section 174 (CrPC 155) requires the officer to record the substance of the information and refer the informant to the Magistrate; investigation needs the Magistrate's order. The Force's own powers under Sections 6 and 8 are a separate statutory scheme.

1746. Section 5 of the RP(UP) Act declares offences under the Act:

  1. A. Cognizable but bailable
  2. B. Compoundable by the Station Master
  3. C. Cognizable and non-bailable
  4. D. Non-cognizable, notwithstanding the Code of Criminal Procedure
Answer: Non-cognizable, notwithstanding the Code of Criminal Procedure
Explanation: Section 5 overrides the First Schedule classification and makes offences under the Act non-cognizable; the Act then separately arms the Force with arrest and inquiry powers.
1747. The connivance limb of Section 4 can be applied to which of the following persons?
  1. A. A railway ticket examiner on a different train
  2. B. A passer-by who saw the crime
  3. C. A court clerk handling the case
  4. D. An agent in charge of managing the land or building of the owner
Answer: An agent in charge of managing the land or building of the owner
Explanation: Section 4 covers the owner or occupier and an agent of such owner or occupier in charge of the management of the land or building.
1748. A tea-stall owner on whose rented shop-front a thief stores a sack of railway bolts was never told what the sack contained. Section 4 connivance cannot be established because:
  1. A. Shop-fronts are not 'land or building'
  2. B. Section 4 applies only to railway employees
  3. C. Connivance requires wilful acquiescence with knowledge, which is absent
  4. D. Bolts are not railway property
Answer: Connivance requires wilful acquiescence with knowledge, which is absent
Explanation: Section 4 requires that the owner or occupier 'wilfully' connive, which means knowing tolerance of the offence; ignorance of the sack's contents defeats the charge.
1749. Which of the following correctly distinguishes Section 4 from Section 3 of the RP(UP) Act in sentencing?
  1. A. Section 4 carries a mandatory minimum of one year; Section 3 has none
  2. B. Both prescribe identical minimums
  3. C. Neither Section authorises a fine
  4. D. Section 3 carries mandatory minimums absent special reasons; Section 4 has none
Answer: Section 3 carries mandatory minimums absent special reasons; Section 4 has none
Explanation: Section 3 fixes minimum imprisonment and fine absent special reasons; Section 4 simply sets a ceiling of five years, so the Court has full discretion below it.
1750. What does the savings part of Section 16 provide regarding offences under the repealed 1955 Act committed before the repeal?
  1. A. They must be re-registered under Section 3 of the 1966 Act
  2. B. They may be investigated, inquired into and tried as if the 1966 Act had not been passed
  3. C. They are tried only by the Railway Claims Tribunal
  4. D. They are extinguished and cannot be tried
Answer: They may be investigated, inquired into and tried as if the 1966 Act had not been passed
Explanation: Section 16 saves pre-repeal offences, which are dealt with under the old law as though the new Act had not been passed.
1751. The RP(UP) Act, 1966 repealed which earlier Act and is the successor of its scheme?
  1. A. The Indian Railways Act, 1890
  2. B. The Railway Servants Act, 1920
  3. C. The Railway Protection Force Act, 1957
  4. D. The Railway Stores (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1955
Answer: The Railway Stores (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1955
Explanation: Section 16 repeals the Railway Stores (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1955. The RPF Act, 1957 and the Railways Act continue independently.
1752. A woman bought a bundle of copper wire from a neighbour and kept it at home without knowing it was railway property. Which doctrine is central to deciding if 'possession' under Section 3 is made out against her?
  1. A. Strict liability without any regard to knowledge
  2. B. Constructive liability of every household member
  3. C. Conscious possession, i.e. knowledge and control over the thing
  4. D. Vicarious liability of the neighbour
Answer: Conscious possession, i.e. knowledge and control over the thing
Explanation: Criminal 'possession' is understood as conscious possession (see Sanjay Dutt v. State). Whether she knew the character of the goods and whether circumstances raised reasonable suspicion are tested on facts; she may rebut by proving lawful acquisition.
1753. In Shambhu Nath Mehra v. State of Ajmer (1956), the Supreme Court held that Section 106 of the Evidence Act (now BSA Section 109) does NOT:
  1. A. Allow courts to draw adverse inferences
  2. B. Apply to any criminal trial
  3. C. Relieve the prosecution of its duty to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt
  4. D. Apply to facts within an accused's knowledge
Answer: Relieve the prosecution of its duty to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt
Explanation: Section 106 is an exception only for facts especially within the accused's knowledge; it does not relieve the prosecution of proving its case. The same logic frames Section 3's burden on lawful possession.
1754. In Noor Aga v. State of Punjab (2008), concerning reverse-onus provisions of the NDPS Act, the Supreme Court's principle that is equally relevant to RP(UP) Section 3 is that:
  1. A. The accused must disprove guilt beyond reasonable doubt
  2. B. Reverse-onus clauses are always unconstitutional
  3. C. Possession alone, without any suspicion, is sufficient for conviction
  4. D. Such a provision is valid but the prosecution must first establish the foundational facts
Answer: Such a provision is valid but the prosecution must first establish the foundational facts
Explanation: Noor Aga upheld statutory reverse burdens as reasonable, but insisted that the prosecution first prove the basic facts on which the presumption rests; that is the two-stage structure of Section 3.
1755. Which of the following is the correct sequence of the stages by which Section 3 liability on the possession limb arises?
  1. A. Accused proves innocence first, then prosecution proves property
  2. B. Magistrate presumes guilt, then police prove possession
  3. C. Prove theft by a named person, then prove possession
  4. D. Prove railway property, prove possession, show reasonable suspicion of theft/unlawful acquisition, then accused must prove lawful possession
Answer: Prove railway property, prove possession, show reasonable suspicion of theft/unlawful acquisition, then accused must prove lawful possession
Explanation: The prosecution proves the foundational facts (railway property; possession; reasonable suspicion), after which the statutory burden to prove lawful possession shifts to the accused. Proof of a named thief is not required.
1756. An unclaimed bag deposited at a railway cloak room is taken by a thief. For Section 2 purposes, the bag is railway property because it is:
  1. A. In the charge or possession of the railway administration
  2. B. Declared by the Magistrate to be railway property
  3. C. Owned by the Railway Board
  4. D. Insured with the Railways
Answer: In the charge or possession of the railway administration
Explanation: The definition covers property 'in the charge or possession' of the railway administration; ownership is not necessary, so goods held in the cloak room qualify.
1757. Fish-plates stacked beside the track, awaiting laying, are removed by a villager at night and found in his cowshed. Which feature makes them 'railway property'?
  1. A. They become railway property only after being laid
  2. B. They are 'animals' in railway custody
  3. C. They are 'goods' belonging to or in the charge of the railway administration
  4. D. They are 'valuable security'
Answer: They are 'goods' belonging to or in the charge of the railway administration
Explanation: Fish-plates are goods belonging to the railway administration whether or not already laid, so they fall within the definition the moment they are the railway's goods.
1758. A trespasser occupies a vacant railway quarter (a building) without authority. Can he be prosecuted under Section 3 of the RP(UP) Act merely for such occupation?
  1. A. No, because the Act applies only to moving trains
  2. B. Yes, because a building is railway property
  3. C. Yes, but only if the building is a station
  4. D. No, because buildings and land are outside the definition of railway property in Section 2
Answer: No, because buildings and land are outside the definition of railway property in Section 2
Explanation: Railway property is limited to goods, money, valuable security and animals; unauthorised occupation of land or buildings is dealt with under other laws, not Section 3.
1759. Which of the following four classes of property does the Section 2 definition of 'railway property' enumerate?
  1. A. Land, buildings, locomotives and rolling stock
  2. B. Goods, immovable property, land and animal
  3. C. Goods, money, valuable security and animal
  4. D. Rolling stock, track, signals and stations
Answer: Goods, money, valuable security and animal
Explanation: The definition lists goods, money, valuable security and animals belonging to or in the charge or possession of a railway administration. Land and buildings are not within the definition.
1760. 'Railway administration' for purposes of the RP(UP) Act refers to which of the following, following the Railways law definition?
  1. A. Only the Divisional Railway Manager
  2. B. Only the Railway Board
  3. C. Only the General Manager of a zone
  4. D. The Central Government or a Railway Company, as the case may be, owning or working the railway
Answer: The Central Government or a Railway Company, as the case may be, owning or working the railway
Explanation: The Railways law defines 'railway administration' as the Government or the Railway Company that owns or works the railway; property in its charge or possession is railway property under the Act.

Explore More Practice Topics and Quizzes